Triumph Bonneville SE and Ducati GT 1000 touring.The Bonneville moniker first affixed itself to Triumph’s 650cc Parallel Twin-powered T120 in 1959, a high-performance ride through the ‘60s that earned its classy moniker as a tribute to the land speed racing exploits of the British marque during the 1950s. A second Bonneville incarnation, dubbed the T140, upped displacement to 750cc but ended production with Triumph’s decline and near obliteration in the early ‘80s. The Bloor restoration of the historic English marque saw the Bonneville’s return in 2001, where it has since anchored the company’s Modern Classics.
Triumph expanded the Bonneville line by two additional models, with an all-new base model and SE version. The two join the long-standing Bonneville T100, which continues in the Modern Classic line, relegating its spot as the flagship to the new Bonneville. The new Bonnie varies from its T100 with smaller ergos and wheels, the hoops being two inches smaller and cast instead of wire-spoked. As for the difference between the base Bonneville and the SE, it’s cosmetic, with the SE sporting a tank badge, aluminum engine cases and a two-tone paint scheme with pinstripe, as well as the inclusion of a useful tachometer on the instrument console. All three Bonnevilles, as well as the entire 2009 Modern Classic Twins, are fuel injected for the first time to meet US emissions.
Right out of the box, the Bonneville struck an authentic chord in the looks department. The Bonneville SE we tested generated, by far, the most awestruck praise from roadside gawkers – quite a compliment considering Ducati’s undoubted skill at producing sexy bikes. And this was in spite of the SE’s lack of wire-spoked wheels, which is such a huge part of the vintage look. Were I to purchase a Bonneville, I’d have to tap the wire-spoked T100 for this very reason alone. The Trumpet scores a big win over the Duc in the very subjective styling comparison.
As for the motor, the Triumph’s 865cc Parallel Twin doesn’t measure up to the Ducati, down 127cc to it competitor. Engine performance expectations have dramatically inflated since the Bonnie’s debut 50 years ago. The modern Twin cranks 58 horsepower at the rear wheel and 44 lb-ft torque. It doesn’t take long at the controls to realize the Bonneville motor is tuned for a more leisurely riding approach - much different than the Ducati’s rip-snorting L-Twin.
Yet the Triumph Twin delivers enough pep to motor up to triple digits and is spunky in its 4000 rpm sweet spot. The old riding bromide about riding a slow bike fast rings true on the Bonneville – a rider with moderate skills will be pushing the Twin to its limit. There’s a certain thrill in that
Seamless power delivery and user-friendly throttle feel highlight the Twin’s traits. Considering it’s the first year of fuel-injection for the Modern Classics, Triumph nailed it first time around. The two-stage choke, unlike the carbs, is real and needed on cold starts. As for those façade carbs, explaining them to curious onlookers is an amusing novelty at parking lots and gas stations – particularly to riders who claimed they could tell the Bonnie was carbureted by its sound or smell…
Smooth and easy, a rider can’t get lost in the Triumph’s 5-speed gearbox. Teamed with one of the lightest clutch lever pulls we’ve sampled, the transmission lends itself well to entry-level riders who won’t be missing shifts or fumbling with neutral at stop lights.
One disc down up front compared to the dual-disc Ducati, the Triumph brakes without drama via a single 310mm rotor up front. Head to head, the Duc’s dual Brembo calipers deliver superior feel, but Triumph’s Nissin 2-piston caliper binders make confident, controlled stops. While the lever is stiffer on the Triumph, there weren’t any helter skelter moments for us under hard braking.
After the motor, handling performance is where the Triumph loses the most ground on the Ducati. Its softer 41mm Kayaba fork hinders high-speed maneuvering, and while the dual rear shocks (also Kayaba) are pre-load adjustable, railing in tight terrain overtaxes both the suspension units. That said, the Bonneville handles sharp at lower speeds with its low center of gravity, and is one of the easiest-to-ride shifting motorbikes we’ve ever sampled.
The Bonneville ergonomics fit smaller-statured riders well, Triumph lowering the seat height to 29.5 inches and repositioning the bars down and toward the rider. While it didn’t gel as well with my 6’1” frame (probably anyone approaching 5’10” will be too big) the riding position is upright, standard and comfortable, except for one big, huge, gigantic, stupendous caveat (brace yourself, a seat diatribe on its way…).
Short distance jaunts on the Bonnie are fine, but we started getting uncomfortable after about 100 miles, perturbed at 150, and delirious about the 200-mile mark in the Triumph’s excruciating saddle. The new Bonneville’s seat height is lower, in part, because they sculpted some foam out. Bad idea! I wondered how the SE’s seat would hold up on long distance rides during our brief sub-100-mile test ride at the official press launch in New Orleans. Now I know, and my tookus still whines, “remember that day you rode 250 miles on the Bonneville SE? Man, I will never forgive your ass for that!”
Admitting that… The two-inch lower seat height, along with a narrower tank, makes the Bonneville feel way smaller than the Ducati, even though at 497 lbs (472 lbs tank empty) it is actually a full 31 lbs heavier. The small dimensions make mincemeat out of those tricky low-speed maneuvers that really jump out and bite beginners.
The Bonneville and GT recorded almost identical fuel efficiency – the Triumph edging out a 48.6 to 47.3 mpg advantage. The Bonneville has a slightly bigger fuel tank too, 4.2 gal to 3.9 gal, with a theoretical range near 200 miles. The strange thing is the Bonneville always seemed to want gas first during our 750-mile test ride with the low fuel light constantly coming on (the Speed Triple registered a similar complaint during our 2007 street fighter test). Not a mystery is which bike is easier to fill, with the Bonneville splashing gas out on more than one occasion and the fuel cap fully detaching from the bike (easy to misplace for scatter brained test riders…).
Solid fit and finish round out an attractive, if Spartan, instrument package. The SE’s analog right-side tach teams well with the left-side speedo (the standard Bonneville not offering a tach). A fuel gauge would be appreciated, though there’s no real room for one, just a couple idiot lights and neutral, high-beam and turn signal indicator lights.
The Bonneville delivers a lot of bang for the buck. At $8399 for the SE and $7699 for the standard Bonneville, it’s 30-35% less expensive than the Ducati! I have to admit, however, that I’d spring the extra $400 for the $8799 T100 for the wire-spoked wheels alone. (The T100, which is unchanged for 2009 except for being fuel injected, is a much better fit ergonomically for larger riders as well.)
In short, the Bonneville SE is not a bad machine by any means. Power delivery won’t overwhelm newbies but still gets the Trumpet up to respectable cruising speeds. It’s a fun ride and an ideal bike for smaller riders. Faced against the Ducati, however, we imagine if it could talk, even the polite British Twin would acquiesce it does not compare with its sportier Italian rival. The Bonnie still keeps a stiff upper lip, however, secure in its role as an ideal starter bike or sharp-looking play bike for the casual weekend enthusiast.
You can keep track of a custom job StopTech did for a screaming 1999 Chevy Camaro SS over on the LS1 Tech Forum for Firebird and Camaro lovers.
